Le vendredi 17 février 2006 à 09:11 -0500, Dan Winship a écrit : > > It's foolish to imagine that being in the desktop release set is > > essential. But it's also foolish to ignore the big benefits to focusing > > our efforts (in a synchronized way) on particular implementations of the > > features that we want. It allows us to release software for distros to > > use. > > Do we have any evidence that any distro actually cares what we consider > to be in and out of the desktop release? Is there some distro out there > loyally shipping epiphany as its default browser and waiting for us to > certify GIMP before they allow it into the default desktop install? Debian still ships epiphany as the default browser. However we didn't wait for your approval to make gimp part of the gnome-office metapackage :) -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin mouette ens-lyon org `. `' joss debian org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=