tor, 07 12 2006 kl. 13:31 +0100, skrev Marco Barisione: > Il giorno gio, 07/12/2006 alle 12.28 +0100, Paolo Maggi ha scritto: > > > 2. Include a standard language picker widget. Lots of applications > > > are going to want this, and it's going to become messy if people can't > > > just drop in something. This has applications beyond spell-checking > > > too. I personally feel that it's nicest to check words in the union > > > of selected languages, so that users don't have to micro-manage > > > settings for each UI element that they may potentially be typing in. > > > > I agree. > > For long texts it would be good to have an algorithm to recognize the > language of a single paragraph, Microsoft Word does it, but I don't know > how it works. So far as we spell check as each word is entered, if we hit above say 90% known in one dictionary then it's probably that language. A good guess is easy to make and will often be correct. Naturally this solution is far from perfect but it should give us a good indication within the first sentence or so. Or am I just spouting bull? - David Nielsen -- "Ridicule s the only weapon that can be used against unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct before reason can act upon them.” -Thomas Jefferson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel