Re: IMPORTANT: fix critical warnings before January 1st

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On 11/11/05, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> [Dropping the devel-announce-list cc until we have an announcement
> rather than discussion]
>
> On 11/11/05, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com> wrote:
> > On 11/11/05, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> > > Why a keyword over say the status whiteboard?  I don't imagine that
> > > people will widely search for these after a couple months down the
> > > road (i.e. when we've cleaned almost all of them out), meaning it
> > > would just be keyword pollution.
> >
> > Point. What would the standard word be to use in the whiteboard?
>
> I dunno.  Anyone have good suggestions?  "critical-warning-crasher" maybe?
>
> Also, as an aside,
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/boogle.cgi?query="-CRITICAL"; seems
> to be fairly good at catching these as a first approximation, though
> the lack of case sensitivity also catches places where people say
> things like "non-critical".  It may be possible to generate a good
> enough query without manually marking all the relevant bugs.

Oh, hrm, good point- I was assuming they'd be unqueryable.

Luis