Re: IMPORTANT: fix critical warnings before January 1st

[Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>]

[Dropping the devel-announce-list cc until we have an announcement
rather than discussion]

On 11/11/05, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com> wrote:
> On 11/11/05, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com> wrote:
> > Why a keyword over say the status whiteboard?  I don't imagine that
> > people will widely search for these after a couple months down the
> > road (i.e. when we've cleaned almost all of them out), meaning it
> > would just be keyword pollution.
>
> Point. What would the standard word be to use in the whiteboard?

I dunno.  Anyone have good suggestions?  "critical-warning-crasher" maybe?

Also, as an aside,
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/reports/boogle.cgi?query="-CRITICAL"; seems
to be fairly good at catching these as a first approximation, though
the lack of case sensitivity also catches places where people say
things like "non-critical".  It may be possible to generate a good
enough query without manually marking all the relevant bugs.