OT: better than polls [WAS: roadmap status update/update request]
- From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke gnu org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Eugenia Loli-Queru <eloli hotmail com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen cs uu nl>
- Subject: OT: better than polls [WAS: roadmap status update/update request]
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:58:01 +0100
Havoc Pennington writes:
> I've seen hundreds of web polls and read a mind-blowing number of
> articles on Slashdot, LWN, LinuxToday, OSNews, etc. My estimate of
> overlap of the priorities of posters to these sites with Red Hat's
> enterprise customers is 5%. My estimate of the overlap of the priorities
> of posters to these sites with "average corporate or home desktop user"
> is 5%. I am not exaggerating.
Hmm, we were thinking of web polls as a better means of gathering
interesting/important feature requests than [griped] user postings on
the mailing list. Maybe that would still be a worthwile effort, but
not the best way to go.
> We do, but we have better ways to find out than web polls.
Now that is interesting. Would you want to share some of those better
ways with two guys (cc: Han-Wen an me) who are seeking to start-up a
small business around LilyPond support?
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke gnu org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]