On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 12:00 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
>On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:18:47 +0800, Davyd Madeley <davyd madeley id au> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 16:49 +0000, Calum Benson wrote:
>> >Well, I said I'd revert it if it caused anyone a problem and I'm still
>> >happy to do so, but at this late stage I guess it's a release team
>> >decision.
>> Sure.
>> Well, I've been shooting with the patch reverted. Shaun, how much
>> documentation will reverting this patch cause regressions too?
>Sounds like it was just a mistake and since no one uses the default
>theme because it's so insidiously ugly, it wasn't caught until now. 
>Anyway, the bug is a regression and the fix is merely to revert to
>something that was well tested.  Since Shaun replied without saying
>it'd cause him problems, I'm assuming it doesn't (hurry and scream
>Shaun if I drew the wrong conclusion).  So, here's approval 1 of 2 to
>revert the change.

It'll inconvenience me, but I can manage.  Let's just fix the damn
thing and move on with our lives.

And in the future, let's tell people to go to hell when they don't
submit patches correctly.  An extra five minutes on the contributor's
part saves hours of frustration for everybody else.  Nobody is above
proper patch submission.

Seriously miffed,

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]