Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers]



Frederic Crozat wrote:

Le lundi 28 février 2005 à 22:57 +0100, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
There is one bugreport with patches that I think should be looked at
before 2.10:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137864

It would be very nice if we could ship with the patches in here included
as well. I got the impression Mandrake has already been using these.

FYI, these patches has been integrated in Mdk vte package for Mdk 10.1
(out for almost 6 months now) and I did get any bug report caused by
them.

Has anyone been testing the vte accessibility with these patches? I would have some concerns there, as we (Sun) are not using these patches at the moment.

However, we *are* using patches for the following bugs, which we consider vital for accessibility:

153405 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153405> cri Urg nalin redhat com NEW Terminal crashes often while working with gnopernicus

	
	
	
	
	
	
113590 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113590> maj Hig nalin redhat com NEW vte and AtkText selection

	
	
	
	
	
	

	
	
	
	
	
	
132316 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132316> nor Hig nalin redhat com NEW terminal widget's context menu posting isn't exposed as a... 138653 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138653> nor Hig nalin redhat com NEW crash opening/closing multiple gnome-terminal tabs

	
	
	
	
	
	
156161 <http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156161> nor Nor nalin redhat com UNCO AccessibleText_getTextAtOffset returns wrong values in g...

	
	
	
	
	
	



In particular the patches for 153405, 138653, and 156161 fix several crasher scenarios. Bug 113590 prevents the implementation of a key ATK interface.

I consider vte to be unmaintained.

- Bill




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]