Re: Gnome Session Services Framework
- From: Colin Walters <walters verbum org>
- To: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnome Session Services Framework
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:03:29 -0400
Mark, thanks for these comments, they're definitely useful.
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 17:16 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
>
> For various reasons I'm not entirely sure it makes sense to use D-BUS
> notification:
>
> - We're not actually interested in using the D-BUS service acquired by
> the app - i.e. there isn't actually much of a requirement for the
> session manager to send messages to the app
Well, not necessarily the session manager, but it could happen that we
want inter-service messaging, like the battery panel applet querying
gnome-power-manager.
By using D-BUS activation we allow for these kinds of dependencies; the
battery applet would automatically wait for the session bus to activate
g-p-m when it sent a message to org.gnome.PowerManager or whatever.
> - It actually winds up being quite complicated to do it this way. I'd
> be worried about this extra complexity adding extra points of
> failure
>
> - Because of the complexity, we need a library for the service side
I think if we fix the env bug we can probably avoid the library.
> - We use startup-notification in order to be notified when the app
> app has fully started up
Hm, so every service links to startup-notification? That means they all
have to have an X connection, which is a bit weird for some of them.
Also this would make s-n part of the developer platform, right? Maybe
not a big deal, but something to consider.
> - In the normal case, if we want to stop a service (e.g. at logout),
> then we just kill it
>
> - If an app really needs to be notified that its about to be killed,
> it could have a %p argument on its command-line which would cause
> the session manager to pass it the read side of a pipe which the
> app should poll() on. When the session manager closes its side, the
> app should shut down gracefully.
Hm...possible but kind of ugly...It seems a bit nicer to tell service
developers to just implement an org.gnome.SessionService.OnShutdown
method or something.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]