Re: Dumping gnome-smproxy in 2.14



Am Samstag, den 23.07.2005, 00:58 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> Am Freitag, den 22.07.2005, 08:38 -0600 schrieb Elijah Newren:
> > On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:57 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > > Honestly, any reason to wait to 2.14?
> > > 
> > >         I'd like to, but I just don't think its very good form to do it post
> > > feature freeze.
> > 
> > When it fixes all kinds of bugs that ought to be considered
> > showstoppers?  Also, from your explanation it didn't sound like you
> > were proposing to add any features, merely to remove a "Feature" (i.e.
> > BUG).  Having read lots of bug reports about the first three example
> > bugs you list (I guess the other two were before my time?  Don't know
> > why I didn't know about them), two of which basically make Gnome
> > unusable, and additionally having been affected by all of those three
> > on various occasions, even if this did break feature freeze I think
> > you'd likely get the necessary approvals.
> > 
> > Also, Havoc's comments about removing it seem instructive here (he
> > thought it had already happened and that it should if it hadn't--and
> > that was two years ago):
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118063#c27
> 
> Did anybody of you already ask for approval? Mark, are you willing to
> handle this?

Obviously not. I will ask the release team and inform you about the
feedback.

-- 
Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]