Am Freitag, den 22.07.2005, 08:38 -0600 schrieb Elijah Newren: > On 7/22/05, Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 09:57 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > > > Honestly, any reason to wait to 2.14? > > > > I'd like to, but I just don't think its very good form to do it post > > feature freeze. > > When it fixes all kinds of bugs that ought to be considered > showstoppers? Also, from your explanation it didn't sound like you > were proposing to add any features, merely to remove a "Feature" (i.e. > BUG). Having read lots of bug reports about the first three example > bugs you list (I guess the other two were before my time? Don't know > why I didn't know about them), two of which basically make Gnome > unusable, and additionally having been affected by all of those three > on various occasions, even if this did break feature freeze I think > you'd likely get the necessary approvals. > > Also, Havoc's comments about removing it seem instructive here (he > thought it had already happened and that it should if it hadn't--and > that was two years ago): > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118063#c27 Did anybody of you already ask for approval? Mark, are you willing to handle this? -- Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil