Am Montag, den 22.08.2005, 13:37 +0200 schrieb Rodrigo Moya: > there is no reason to force us to do GNOME 3.0, but since many GNOME > libraries will be disappearing with Ridley, we might want to call it > 3.0, so that we don't have to maintain the old libraries around. > > Also, as we deprecate most stuff in libgnome/libgnomeui, we might want > to think about the role of those libraries. I would suggest we use them > for having high-level desktop oriented things in one place, like, for > instance, talking to the panel/window manager/file manager/etc, > notifications, services (libgnomeservice), libegg, icon theme. > Thus, as we reduce the number of generic libraries by getting them into > GTK+, we also reduce the number of specific, high-level libraries, by > putting them into libgnome/libgnomeui. Since we'll always need these > high-level libraries, instead of killing libgnome* > (http://live.gnome.org/LibgnomeMustDie), it might be much better to > change its purpose. > > All those would be enough to justify a GNOME 3.0 :) Does this also mean that we can get rid of deprecated API like GtkTree, GtkCList or GtkFileSelector? -- Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part