Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 13:18 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:

> I'm assuming that if I keep pushing this and making it more useful
> someone is going to eventually give me/gnome a faster box to do it on.
> :) (and then we get into the fun world of -j ;)

I think the UCC can do something to provide number crunching power...
just as soon as we work out how to cool it. Of course, most of our spare
CPU power is currently in the form of Alpha CPUs, but I guess that would
check that our code was also 64-bit clean.


Davyd Madeley
08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118  C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]