Re: cleaning up themes

[Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>]

On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 22:36 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> Owen Taylor wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 16:58 +0200, uws wrote:
> > 
> >>P�at, Jul 30, 2005 at 02:52:30PM +0200, Murray Cumming skrev:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 12:18 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm sure I've brought this up before, but I think we should clean up the
> >>>>list of themes we ship for G2.12.
> >>
> >>>Maybe for 2.14/2.14, but I'm not personally going to approve this
> >>>feature-freeze break. It's bad enough that the change of the default
> >>>theme has taken this long. Well, maybe it'd be ok to remove the non-
> >>>default "default".
> >>
> >>If the default is just the built-in theme in GTK+ (no way to check now, no X
> >>over here), I think a rename to "Built-in" is the best.
> > 
> > 
> > The Red Hat packages have renamed this theme to "Raleigh" for a long
> > time to avoid having a non-default Default. (It is derived from the
> > Raleigh theme we did for GTK+-1.2)
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 						Owen
> > 
> 
> Here are two patches to rename the "Default" theme to "Raleigh". One 
> patch alters GTK+ to install the default gtkrc into the Raleigh 
> directory, and the other one patches gnome-themes so that the 
> "Traditional" metatheme uses "Raleigh" rather than "Default".
> 
> Changing the name of the default gtk themes may break existing configs 
> and uses. However, GTK+ will always fall back to the default theme if 
> "Default" is not found, so this would not cause any problems.
> 

I have applied this patch today.
The built-in theme in GTK+ 2.8 will be called "Raleigh", not "Default".

Matthias