Re: more build sherrif-ery (and a touch of auto*)
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
- Cc: Jody Goldberg <jody novell com>, louie novell com, jordi sindominio net, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: more build sherrif-ery (and a touch of auto*)
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:01:18 +0000
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 11:00 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
> Jody Goldberg wrote:
>
> >>So what do we do about this? Is this the point where we finally force
> >>everything to dump automake 1.4? Or do we revert this?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >If we're ever going to do it now is the time.
> >
> >
> First of all, sorry for the breakage. I gave Jordi permission to commit
> the patch, but hadn't checked that Automake-1.4 had the flag.
>
> As for getting rid of Automake 1.4 as a requirement for building Gnome,
> it sounds like a good idea. I just did a quick check of my build trees,
> and the list of modules in the gnome desktop that still use 1.4 are:
>
> bug-buddy, eel, eog, ggv, gnome-control-center, gnome-mag,
> gnome-netstatus, gnome-system-tools, gnome-terminal, gtkhtml2,
> libart_lgpl, libcroco, libgail-gnome, libgtop, metacity, nautilus,
> nautilus-cd-burner, procman, startup-notification, vino
If anyone fancies taking care of nautilus-cd-burner, please be my guest.
---
Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]