Re: Proposal: replacing esound with polypaudio in 2.10
- From: Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <uraeus gnome org>
- To: "Ronald S. Bultje" <rbultje ronald bitfreak net>
- Cc: Callum McKenzie <callum physics otago ac nz>, Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: replacing esound with polypaudio in 2.10
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:47:08 +0100
Another important point is that if we get the proposed GStreamer ding-
caching abstraction going then people on the more obscure platforms can
keep using esound until the day one of them bothers porting polypaudio
to their platform of choice. This is IMHO a nicer solution for these
people that an esound backend for polypaudio.
Christian
On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 08:17 +0100, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 23:00, Callum McKenzie wrote:
> > What is the full list of operating systems esd supports ? Should
> > polyaudio have an esd backend for the ultimate in stop-gap
> > compatibility/insanity ?
>
> Just to add to what Lennart replied: esound theoratically works on
> pretty much almost anything. It has drivers for win32, HP-UX, AIX, IRIX,
> BSDs (OSS), Linux (ALSA/OSS), Solaris, OS X, OS/2 and Tru64. I doubt
> that all of those work in practice.
>
> Ronald
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]