Re: battstat-applet testing, a plea for help



On Sun, 2004-05-23 at 19:37:52 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 19:52 -0300, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 20:19 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
>
> > > Checking the code...
> > > new_label is defined statically and snprintf'ed into.
> >
> > Why not g_strdup_printf'ed into? It's the glibby thing to do...
>
> I didn't write it ;)

No, I'm afraid I probably did. I probably wasn't aware of that function
back then.

(Thanks to anyone who looked after the battstat code for the last couple
of years. Sorry about the mess. :)

-- 
Jörgen Pehrson  jp spektr eu org  http://spektr.eu.org/~jp/
-----------------------------------------------------------
"i must say the linux community is a lot nicer than the unix
community. a negative comment on unix would warrent death
threats. with linux, it is like stirring up a nest of butterflies."
             -- Ken Thompson. 1999




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]