> I personally have currently 40'000 folders in the depths of my home > directory, if the size is the same or not doesn't really matter for > most of them, since I couldn't remember them anyway. Ingo, you DEFINITELY are NOT the use case for a graphical file manager. Spatial or browser. Good luck with the 40.000 folders, and keep in mind you're the special "corner" case and not the common case. > > There is stuff like showing hidden files that is currently deeply > hidden in the Preferences dialog, such stuff really must be placed in > a easy to reach way, without a toolbar however this isn't really > possbile. Preferences... in the toolbar? You aren't serious, right? > Well, there are a lot of people out there that just doesn't like > spatial view, if you come and tell them that its faster, yet, their > own experince shows that it is slower, you should really take the time > and explain why you think its faster and what fatal fault the users > are doing that slows them down. > > As said, spatial view might be easier with a few files and reasonably > flat directories, again, like 80% of the cases. > but I don't see it being faster in any way. > > -- > WWW: http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/ > JabberID: grumbel jabber org > ICQ: 59461927 -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente