Re: Some more thoughts on Java vs Mono debate
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: Xavier Cho <fender gnome or kr>, Gnome desktop-devel list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Some more thoughts on Java vs Mono debate
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:02:34 -0500
Hello,
> > Agreed. But don't you think it is a huge loss if we can't use many of
> > useful 3rd party libraries or tools built around Java or .NET for
> > compatibility reasons?
>
> Definitely. Its equivalent to being able to program in C but not having
> 75% of the standard C library available. Anyone who had the misfortune
> to write C code on VMS can probably relate to exactly what it was like.
btw, our independent stack, built on top of ECMA contains:
OpenGL bindings.
Mozilla bindings.
Evolution data store bindings.
Gtk bindings (gtk, gdk, atk, glade)
Gnome bindings (gnome, canvas, vte)
XML-RPC bindings.
iFolder
Simias.
LDAP access (Novell.LDAP)
CORBA stack (sadly, it does not use ORBit)
Cairo bindings.
Lucene.NET search engine.
Mono.Security: our underlying implementation for all things crypto (SSL/TLS implementation included).
ECLA CLI image manipulation library.
Depending on 4 interfaces from System.Data:
MySQL, Postgress, DB2, Oracle, Sybase, Sql Server, Sqllite
So not the end of the world really if we cant write ASP.NET server
applications for the desktop, or if we cant use Windows.Forms.
Miguel.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]