Re: Proposed: Evolution (and associated libs)



<quote who="Chipzz">

> I'm against removing gal in the 2.6 timeframe, you guys should probably
> look at what widgets those apps are using and consider pushing them in- to
> some other library (because I think there are quite some potentially
> usefull widgets in gal, which other apps could benefit from), and remo- ve
> gal in the 2.8 timeframe.

[ In most cases the other apps should be porting to GTK+ widgets anyway,
such as TreeView. They decided to depend on a non-platform library, they
have to live with the consequences. :-) ]

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia         http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
 
    "You know, it's not that unusual, even in Hollywood, for brothers to
         work together. Heard of the Warner brothers?" - Ethan Coen



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]