Re: Proposed: Rhythmbox
- From: Alan <alan ufies org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposed: Rhythmbox
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:28:06 -0800
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:15:27AM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Eugenia Loli-Queru">
>
> > I understand your point, however RB does things that Totem can't, in regards
> > to playlists, radio station management etc, it is really geared towards
> > music and music management, while Totem is mostly towards video playback
> > (while it can of course play music as well).
>
> (That is precisely the reason why Totem may be more appropriate for
> inclusion in the basic Desktop release - providing sound, music and video
> playing - where Rhythmbox has a more specific task, and may be more
> appropriate for a separate multimedia release.)
The thing is, in the end aren't the distros going to bundle a video
player, music player, etc in with their own packages anyway? They'd be
silly not to IMHO. If I buy FooLinux (as j random user) and it doesn't
include a way to play mp3s and movies, I'm going to take it back and
complain!
alan
--
Alan <alan ufies org> - http://arcterex.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------
"There are only 3 real sports: bull-fighting, car racing and mountain
climbing. All the others are mere games." -- Hemingway
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]