Re: GNOME Namespace Management - ARC & GNOME
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Ed Hunter <ed hunter Sun COM>
- Cc: markmc redhat com, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, sun-sac-foss-ext Sun COM, Brian Cameron Sun COM
- Subject: Re: GNOME Namespace Management - ARC & GNOME
- Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:42:27 +0100
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 15:39 -0800, Ed Hunter wrote:
> I think the last two messages from Murray and Mark bring up one important
> point. We should try and first narrow down (or at least prioritize) the
> "interfaces" we care about. Brian's initial question was around file system
> location. He followed that up with a list of possible interface types that
> are of interest inside Sun and might be of interest to the GNOME community.
> Murray made a pass at identifying which of those were relevant.
[snip]
> 1. Libraries (APIs and SPIs, both functions and header files)
> 2. Command Line Utilities (applications or configuration or
> administration tools)
> 3. Input/output file formats
> 4. Resource & configuration file names and formats and location
> 5. Protocols or inter-component messages
> 6. Log files location and format
> 7. Solaris package names
7 is not of interest to GNOME.
> 8. Daemons
> 9. URLs (need and example of this)
>
> I would separate item one from the list since it sounds like there is already
> a lot of focus on that. The next eight seem ripe for discussion on how their
> evolution might be documented and managed (if at all).
I have to get through John Plocher's email, which might answer some of
this.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]