Re: GNOME Namespace Management - ARC & GNOME
- From: Mike Hearn <mike navi cx>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: sun-sac-foss-ext Sun COM, Glynn Foster Sun COM, desktop-devel-list gnome org, Brian Cameron <brian cameron Sun COM>
- Subject: Re: GNOME Namespace Management - ARC & GNOME
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:54:50 +0000
Murray Cumming wrote:
But I fear that we are talking about simple binary ABI-stability of the
GNOME Platform libraries. If SUN has found that they are not ABI-stable
then they should be telling us, because we want them to be ABI-stable, and
we think they are.
There were some examples posted earlier, eg:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2004-December/msg00214.html
I think the issue is that you're using a different definition of stable
to what Sun is. Sun mean "backwards compatible", whereas you mean "has
the same ABI" which is not the same. It's possible to not break the
binary interface but still stop apps from working when they're upgraded,
and GTK+ has done this in the past with full knowledge.
thanks -mike
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]