Re: gnome-theme-manager ate my baby

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:36:57 -0800, Link Dupont <link subpop net> wrote:
> gnome-theme-manager needs lots of love, in my opinion, but then again I
> was against the whole "meta theme" thing from the beginning...

I really didn't mean this to turn into a 'bash theme-manager' thing; I
hope no one else does, unless they plan to fix them or rewrite it in
the next couple weeks. It has flaws, but so do a lot of things in our
desktop. This is the only flaw that I would try to hold up a release
over (that I know of, having read all ~40 open theme-manager bugs this
morning.)

Luis

> On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 15:10 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > Well, sort of. I had to reboot today, because gnome-theme-manager ate
> > my machine. That's... not good. Sadly, not the first time, but the
> > last couple times I said 'surely, someone else will notice and this
> > will be fixed by the next release'. This time I'm not being slack-
> > I've filed a bug about gnome-theme-manager performance:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160803
> >
> > and judging from comments in #gnome-art, i'm not the first to be
> > bitten by this (though AFAICT I'm the first to file a bug about it,
> > which is pretty poor on my part.)
> >
> > Anyway... I'd really love it if someone could take a look at it. It's
> > pretty embarassing that we ship something as part of the desktop that
> > can cause such extreme system loads under even casual use.
> >
> > Thanks-
> > Luis
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> 
>