Re: Industrial in 2.10?
- From: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
- To: Link Dupont <link subpop net>
- Cc: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Industrial in 2.10?
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:13:22 +0100
Il giorno ven, 03-12-2004 alle 00:48 -0800, Link Dupont ha scritto:
> There are major changes to gtk-engines under way. Might want to talk to
> Thomas & Andrew about this. Plans are to move most of the commonly used
> GTK+ engines into gtk-engines. I'd suggest moving industrial into
> gtk-engines, and have the gtkrc in gnome-themes. Does this make sense?
> Separate the engine from the theme? Since the module gtk-engines exists
> we might as well put GTK+ engines in it, and put GNOME themes into the
> gnome-themes module.
>
> :) Link
[luca redrum GNOME_HEAD]$ head gtk-engines/ChangeLog
2004-12-01 Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>, Andrew Johnson
<ajgenius ajgenius us>
* Update version to 2.5
* Remove pixbuf and notif engines, and misc other files
* Move crux, hc, industrial, mist, thinice engines over from
gnome-themes and gnome-themes-extras
* Replace configure.in with configure.ac
2004-11-02 James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>
The engine code ~ gtkrc separation was simply a proposal. See
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-themes-list/2004-October/msg00000.html
and
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-themes-list/2004-November/msg00016.html
threads on themes lists for details
--
Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]