Re: build sherrif-ery - nautilus-media fails to configure

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:00:33 -0500, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com> wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:51:19 -0500, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 15:50 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 20:13 +0000, Andy Balaam wrote:
> > > > Can anyone be a sherrif?
> > >
> > > Oh, and to answer this more explicitly: anyone can be a nag-style
> > > sheriff (like you have just been- kudos to stepping up), but in the
> > > strictest sense of the word, a sheriff is empowered to also revert
> > > changes or make fixing commits, which is privilege no one at all has
> > > right now.
> > >
> >
> > I nominate Luis for sheriff!
> 
> This would make more sense if I knew a damn thing about auto* :) In
> most of the cases I've seen in the past few weeks, the only thing I
> would have been able to do was revert the commit. Then again, that may
> be the kind of sheriff more maintainers are comfortable with.

Andy has suggested the term 'build terrier' to describe what I've been
doing- seems much more apt than sheriff. Sounds like he'll be joining
me in the nagging too :)

Luis