Re: build sherrif-ery - nautilus-media fails to configure

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:51:19 -0500, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 15:50 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 20:13 +0000, Andy Balaam wrote:
> > > Can anyone be a sherrif?
> >
> > Oh, and to answer this more explicitly: anyone can be a nag-style
> > sheriff (like you have just been- kudos to stepping up), but in the
> > strictest sense of the word, a sheriff is empowered to also revert
> > changes or make fixing commits, which is privilege no one at all has
> > right now.
> >
> 
> I nominate Luis for sheriff!

This would make more sense if I knew a damn thing about auto* :) In
most of the cases I've seen in the past few weeks, the only thing I
would have been able to do was revert the commit. Then again, that may
be the kind of sheriff more maintainers are comfortable with.

Really, though, we need someone to set up daily CVS snapshotting, and
that person needs to become sheriff. My tinderboxing is nice, but
until we distribute daily binaries regularly on popular platforms like
we did pre-2.0, we're selling ourselves short on QA.

Luis