Re: I need a copy of gnoetry (so I can train it on build logs)
- From: Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <uraeus linuxrising org>
- To: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- Cc: hidetoshi tajima sun com, chpe gnome org, rich burridge sun com, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: I need a copy of gnoetry (so I can train it on build logs)
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:41:10 +0100
Hi Luis,
I don't know about the reasons/motivations of Epiphany, but I recently
updated gnome-themes-extras to use automake 1.9. The reason for this I
was told is that new versions of tar actually follows the spec for the
method that automake wants to use, which had the unfortunate side effect
of making 'make dist' impossible in g-t-e (due to the default method
only handling paths with less than 99 characters). I was then told by
the automake people that I needed automake 1.9.x to be able to tell tar
how to do it. Which is why I upgraded. I am guessing that maybe epiphany
might have the same issue I had with long paths, which is why they where
forced to go to automake 1.9 too.
Christian
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:31 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> We have no bananas, or haiku, today.
>
> Culprits:
>
> * gcalctool: looks like a funky new en.po is unloved by something:
> http://gnome-build.ximian.com/tinderbox/LATEST/gcalctool.html#build
>
> * epiphany: automake 1.9? seriously? like, weren't we trying to
> standardize on 1.8?
> http://gnome-build.ximian.com/tinderbox/LATEST/epiphany.html#configure
>
> * nautilus-media- still an ongoing saga here ;)
>
> Love-
> Luis
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]