Re: default theme consensus



On fre, 2004-08-13 at 11:00 +0900, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-08 at 15:13 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Let's have a *quick* discussion, then get somebody with an iron fist to
> > deliver the verdict from on-high.  And I mean quick.  I'm going to start
> 
> My 2 cents: Indubstrial is rounder and more subtle, and thus easier on
> my eyes. I also don't like the deep shadows on Glider, since it draws
> attention to an unimportant area. Although Glider has a passing
> resemblance to plastik.
> 
> Vote: Indubstrial.

Both are very good. Is there any significant performance or resource
differences between the engines? I can't say I have noticed any, but if
there are, we may want to pick the lighter/faster one.

If not, I think Indubstrial does have an edge, visually.


> > --
> > Shaun
> 
> Cheers,
> Ryan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-- 
 
Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
 
Tel. (Japan) 090-3622 8920            Dr. Jan Mor�(mr)
                                      Dept. of Cognitive Science
http://lucs.lu.se/people/jan.moren    Lund, Sweden




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]