Re: new modules consensus
- From: Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc redhat com>, Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: new modules consensus
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:32:07 +0100
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 16:22, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > - gnome-system-tools
> >
> > There was some useful discussion on how to move forward on
> > integrating some of the system tools into the desktop, but at this
> > point we need to choose between include g-s-t as it is now, or not
> > including it at all.
> >
> > The consensus, then, would seem to be that we don't include g-s-t.
>
> I thought the consensus was more towards it being in this time.
>
> Like I say every time, I want it in, because I think that's progress. If
> it's not in then we need to tell the maintainer what he needs to do. He's
> been incredibly patient with us so far, trying to work towards goals that
> we are not clearly defining for him.
I absolutely agree with you 100%. We do need it and the maintainer has
bent over backwards to make it more acceptable and integrate it with
distro's custom tools. If anyone has good reasons for not including it
now or ever then let them say so now.
jamie.
>
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]