Re: gconf backend

On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 11:23:35AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 10:46:34AM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > So you could move the new
> > backend to libxml SAX-style API and still have the same advantage.
>   Are you suggesting "if you want the gconf code back on top of libxml2
> then do it yourself" ? Using "you" instead of "one" suggest this but this
> could be some misunderstanding from my part ...

  Okay, the small rant apart, do you suggest I go dig in to the gconf
parsing code, to try to increase parsing speed ? I could go there once
2.6.0 is finished.
  Do we have some oprofile measures indicating how much gconf initialization
costs when starting a session ? I can feel a few second latency when I
log in my severn box after gdm menu is done and after the gnome "boot"
dialog starts there is a noticeable delay before any startup information
is given. Could that be the cost of the gconfd warmup ? I think I can really
boost performances if there is a large number of files read sequentially.


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]