Re: Yelp Help
- From: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Yelp Help
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:35:45 -0700
OK so the question now I guess is why do we even ship with the xml files
at all? Why not simply pregenerate the files and just use the HTML? It
seems pretty silly to have to know about and run a command to
pregenerate the files, since I think we can be fairly sure that few
users ever will. Instead, they will do what I did and simply be
frustrated by how slow help is out of the box.
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 03:19, Eugene O'Connor wrote:
> You can find documentation on the yelp-pregenerate utility in the GNOME 2.4
> Desktop System Administration Guide. There is an "Improving Performance of Help"
> section at the following URL:
>
> http://www.gnome.org/learn/admin-guide/latest/performance-23.html
>
> Eugene
>
> Narayana Pattipati wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:33:23 +0530
> > From: Narayana Pattipati <narayana pattipati wipro com>
> > Organization: Wipro Technologoes
> > To: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
> > Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > Subject: Re: Yelp Help
> >
> > Pre compiling help HTML documents is possible and its implemented long
> > back. You can use 'yelp-pregenerate' utility to do that. It
> > pre-generates HTML files and stores them in the same location where XML
> > files are lying. And yelp code has provision for picking up the
> > pre-generated HTML file and show it directly instead of converting XML
> > to HTML and then show.
> >
> > It works very well for me.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Narayana
> >
> > Rob Adams wrote:
> >
> > > Is precompiling the help documents not feasible?
> > >
> > > -Rob
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 17:50, Danilo Segan wrote:
> > > > ñðåäà, 24. ñåïòåìáàð 2003. 02:44:52 CEST - Danilo Segan íàïèñà:
> > > > > HEAD presumably has this bug fixed:
> > > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113906
> > > >
> > > > Uhm, make that bug #115289
> > > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115289
> > > >
> > > > That might be a big improvement, so it's probably worth a try.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Danilo
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > > > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> >
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]