Re: [Patch] A clipboard daemon for gnome-settings-daemon
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: Hongli Lai <h lai chello nl>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Patch] A clipboard daemon for gnome-settings-daemon
- Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 21:20:32 +0800
On 06/09/03 19:19, Hongli Lai wrote:
I am aware of all this. But I don't see any other easy way to prevent the
clipboard content from getting lost.
The other alternative is make applications transfer data to the daemon before
they exit, but this requires modification in all applications (or at least
the toolkits; depending on the situation). That's way too much work.
With this daemon, the X clipboard will work very similar to the Win32
clipboard. Yes, memory is wasted, but the content doesn't get lost. And so
far, I have seen a lot more people complaining about the X clipboard
(hundreds) than the Win32 clipboard (nobody; ever heard a user critisize the
Win32 clipboard? I haven't).
Looking at modern win32 applications, I would guess that they work in a
manner closer to the X selection mechanism, with support for transfering
the selection to another daemon on exit.
If I am using Microsoft Word, I can paste data copied from word in a
number of formats, including plain text, html and full word format (ie.
it supports content negotiation). Further more, if I copy a large
amount of text and exit Word, it will pop up a dialog asking if I want
the data to remain available to other apps after exit.
If Word wasn't involved in the "paste" process, I can't see any reason
why it would need to ask this question on exit.
If word wasn't involved, then I would expect that paste would work
equally well before/after exit and use the same amount of memory. If
this was the case, then there wouldn't be much reason to ask the question.
James.
--
Email: james daa com au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]