Re: Epiphany executable name change
- From: Marco Pesenti Gritti <marco gnome org>
- To: Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
- Cc: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Epiphany executable name change
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:38:50 -0500
On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 07:58, Christian Neumair wrote:
> Am Do, den 30.10.2003 schrieb Alexander Larsson um 13:39:
> > On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 18:13, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > we are going to be forced to change epiphany executable name because
> > > it conflicts with an older project distributed in debian.
> > > See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=196491 for details.
> > >
> > > Someone proposed, while we are at it, to rename to gnome-web-browser.
> > > Has anyone problems with it ? Assuming it's ok to do it, would be better
> > > to use a symlink (and to rename the real executable to epiphany-browser
> > > to avoid the conflict) or to rename the real executable directly ?
> > >
> > > The mime db and control center will have to be patched with the updated
> > > name.
> > >
> > > Thanks for any feedback
> >
> > Renaming the epiphany executable seems to be a pretty bad ABI break. It
> > can break all sort of user configurations. I'm not sure a collision with
> > some old game is worth that. I mean, it took quite some time before
> > anyone even noticed.
> Exactly. It's part of the GNOME Desktop, so this isn't very
> user-friendly, especially if you created an Ephy starter in 2.4. If
> Debian people consider this a big problem, they'll have to rename/patch
> this on their own.
Yeah it make a lot of sense. This will have to be solved in some way in
Debian but upstream changes, at this point, are not possible for
epiphany.
Thanks for the help.
Marco
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]