Re: GNOME 2.4.1 and 2.5 schedule

lør, 04.10.2003 kl. 02.49 skrev Callum:
> > > And in my left ear, I hear Alex complaining about the size of the
> > > tarball :)
> > > 
> > > gnome-games is big enough already, and stand-alone games will mean that
> > > they will be maintained or die. Nobody wants their pretty game removed,
> > > but they don't want to maintain it, lazy buggers.
> > 
> > Oh, I think Callum was already proposing nuking some of the old games,
> > so I guess I was making an unstated assumption that it would get smaller
> > before it got bigger. 
> > 
> There are two size related issues for gnome-games. One is obviously the
> tarball size, but that has been steadily decreasing since 2.2 and is now
> 8.4M. My official policy is to keep the gzipped tarball below ten,
> although I think revising that target down to nine is worthwhile. So there
> is room for another game or two.
What about removing po/*.gmo from the tarball? Is there really a reason
to include these in packages at all? They are rebuilt anyways if


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]