Re: Release Team's Almost-Final Modules List
- From: Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
- To: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- Cc: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Release Team's Almost-Final Modules List
- Date: 29 May 2003 11:48:00 +0200
I think the best solution is:
whether wait for GRE before including Epiphany in gnome-desktop AND wait
for totem's gstreamer backend to be complete.
OR
include Epiphany with Mozilla AND Totem with Xine-lib.
I mean, including xine-lib doesn't mean that developers should use
xine-lib instead of gstreamer. That does only mean taht, for now, we
don't have anything better than xine-lib for multimedia but we're
working on a replacement.
Le jeu 29/05/2003 �1:14, Glynn Foster a �it :
> Hey there,
>
> > I have just a stupid question:
>
> Well, here's a stupid answer ;)
>
> > why is it good to add Mozilla dependency to gnome desktop (because of
> > Epiphany) while it is bad to add xine-lib dependency (because of Totem)
> > ? I mean Mozilla is a BIG app while xine-lib is just... a lib.
>
> Because we've already signed ourselves to gstreamer in the desktop -
> having 2 frameworks seems pretty silly to me.
>
> Glynn
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]