Re: Release Team's Almost-Final Modules List
- From: Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Release Team's Almost-Final Modules List
- Date: 29 May 2003 10:12:02 +0200
I have just a stupid question:
why is it good to add Mozilla dependency to gnome desktop (because of
Epiphany) while it is bad to add xine-lib dependency (because of Totem)
? I mean Mozilla is a BIG app while xine-lib is just... a lib.
PS: that's not a troll, I really wonder what you think about that.
> totem
>
> We are leaving Totem as "undecided" for now, pending a 0.6.2 release
> from the GStreamer team. If that indicates that the GStreamer backend
> for Totem has a chance of working in the 2.4 timeframe, it will be
> added to the final modules list. Note that we are not including DVD
> support in our criteria for "working" - this simplifies distributor
> issues anyway. It must be made clear that a media player is a very
> important missing link in the GNOME Desktop release; if Totem with
> gstreamer is not working for 2.4, then we should carefully consider
> our options for 2.6, because it would be disappointing to go without a
> media player in the Desktop release for that long.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]