Re: Privatizing 'linc' ...

Hi guys,

On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 14:16, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 	linc was supposed to be a general purpose library, but it was never
> really up to it. It did solve one problem, however - it split the
> networking layer of the ORB from the GIOP layer which was a big problem
> with ORBit0. I assume you still intend to keep the code modularised,
> though ?

	Yes; that's correct; we should keep it split out; although it'd be nice
to shift bits of the code in both directions.


 michael ximian com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]