Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - nautilus-cd-burner and gnome-vfs funkines s
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: Murray Cumming Comneon com, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - nautilus-cd-burner and gnome-vfs funkines s
- Date: 09 May 2003 11:36:38 +0200
On Fri, 2003-05-09 at 11:27, James Henstridge wrote:
> I think the major reason for the proliferation of URI schemes is because
> that is how gnome-vfs is structured. You write a gnome-vfs module, and
> it handles a virtual file system under a given URI scheme.
>
> There isn't really any way for one vfs module to easily delegate control
> of a subtree to another module without a fair bit of work. If gnome-vfs
> had facilities for setting up these sort of "mount points", then people
> would probably use them.
I don't think we should ever do this. It create a discrepancy between
the real mounted unix filesystem and the vfs view of it. The filesystem
would look different in different apps. Something that is *far* more
confusing than separate roots.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's a fast talking sweet-toothed assassin who dotes on his loving old ma.
She's a radical cigar-chomping bodyguard from a family of eight older
brothers. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]