Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - battfink
- From: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
- To: Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>
- Cc: Murray Cumming Comneon com, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.4 Proposed Modules - battfink
- Date: 02 May 2003 10:21:01 -0400
Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com> writes:
> Right, battfink tries to use ACPI, and then falls back to APM. Most X
> servers should have the DPMS extension, but obviously not all systems
> have APM - the configure *should* check for the existance, and not show
> the battery part of the UI, but I haven't checked this.
Do you mean configure at build time? This has to be run time so that
binaries can work on multiple computers.
Jumping in without looking,
-Jonathan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]