Re: Question about html widget.

On Monday 17 March 2003 23:59, Ian McKellar wrote:
|  On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 14:08, Havoc Pennington wrote:
|  > > It might be a cool hack for a hacker with some time in his/her
|  > > hands...
|  > >
|  > >
|  >
|  > For sure.  Forking khtml would be silly; if we use khtml, it should be
|  > some kind of port that will be accepted upstream and shared with
|  > apple/kde. Otherwise you just aren't getting enough critical mass to
|  > have a chance of handling most web pages.
|  I've been porting Apple's WebCore to Gtk/Gnome for the past few weeks...
|  Its getting there very slowly but it certainly looks feasible. Qt it a
|  lot closer to Gtk than to Cocoa so I've been able to remove a few of
|  Apple's hacks.

Great!  I am certanly curious to test your work.
In case you succeeded with port:  would it  mean that we can use ported 
WebCore on Windows+GTK platform, too?

|  When the whole thing actually builds I'll check it in somewhere.
|  Ian
|  _______________________________________________
|  desktop-devel-list mailing list
|  desktop-devel-list gnome org

Best Regards,

Vadim Plessky
SVG Icons * BlueSphere Icons 0.3.0 released

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]