Re: GnomeMeeting / OpenH323 [Was: 2.4 Module List]
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas urgent rug ac be>
- Cc: Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <Uraeus linuxrising org>, Luis Villa <louie ximian com>, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>, GNOME Desktop List <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, "gnome-hackers gnome org" <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GnomeMeeting / OpenH323 [Was: 2.4 Module List]
- Date: 20 Mar 2003 11:39:06 +0000
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 11:08, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 16:26, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> > > Gstreamer, like xine-lib, include ffmpeg's libavcodec which is pretty
> > > much all that's reverse-engineered patented codecs as well (Sorenson
> > > Video, MPEG4, Windows Media Video and Audio, etc.). I guess there isn't
> > > a single multimedia framework that is free of patent problems.
> > Actually we don't. ffmpeg is pulled in from ffmpeg CVS at buildtime
> > for those who want it.
>
> No, not yet :)
>
> it is always pulled out from cvs because I didn't put in a --disable yet.
>
> And it's always in the release as well, because we make dist it in.
>
> We should really decide what to do here; I remember a discussion with
> Havoc where he suggested splitting gst-plugins in "totally not encumbered"
> and "possibly shady" stuff. Maybe that's one way to go. It would leave
> gst-plugins-totally-not-encumbered pretty dry though.
I talked to Thibaut Mattern from xine, and he would also be happy to do
such a thing with xine. We would really need someone to look over the
available code/codecs for gst and xine, and come up with a list of
things we can ship without a problem. That would really help us get into
distributions.
Cheers
--
/Bastien Nocera
http://hadess.net
#2 0x4205a2cc in printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity) from
/lib/i686/libc.so.6 printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity);
Segmentation fault
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]