Re: Question about html widget.
- From: Julien Olivier <julo altern org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>, Raphael Bosshard <whistler bluewin ch>, Biswapesh Chattopadhyay <biswapesh_chatterjee tcscal co in>, Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, James Henstridge <james daa com au>, GNOME Desktop Devel <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Question about html widget.
- Date: 15 Mar 2003 09:32:52 +0100
> For sure. Forking khtml would be silly; if we use khtml, it should be
> some kind of port that will be accepted upstream and shared with
> apple/kde. Otherwise you just aren't getting enough critical mass to
> have a chance of handling most web pages.
>
I think adopting KHTML (or webcore) inside GNOME could be a very good
strategy for GNOME for two reasons:
- First, KHTML is a great piece of code. It works well and will be even
better with time as Apple codes on it.
- Second, it would be a sign that GNOME wishes to cooperate with KDE in
a less unilateral way. I know that GNOME developers are willing to
cooperate with KDE developers but I think that KDE devs feel pissed off
because until now it was always KDE which had to adopt a foreign lib and
not the contrary (well, most of the time). So, if GNOME could adopt a
very KDE lib, I think that could help some KDE devs to understand that
GNOMErs can do some efforts too.
PS: if you don't agree with me, it's not worth starting a flame, there
are enough flames about this topic on Slashdot and OSNews these days...
> Havoc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]