Re: Question about html widget.

On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 15:28, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>  - clearly the only really viable engines for *web browsing*
>    (vs. limited lightweight use) are khtml and gecko. 
>    gecko is being split out into a library that will be more 
>    usable, khtml could be gtk-ported.

BTW, it might be easier to port WebCore than KHTML.

The reason is that Apple didn't port the KHTML code by modifying it
directly; instead, they wrote replacements for a bunch of Qt/KDE classes
(just enough to make the port work), and it should be relatively simple
to port their replacement classes from Cocoa to GTK.

It might be a cool hack for a hacker with some time in his/her hands...

-- Ettore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]