Re: Galeon2 / Nautilus as a web browser [was: Re: KDE Interop [Wa s: D-BUS background]]

Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 16:22, Vadim Plessky wrote:

On Monday 10 March 2003 17:26, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
|  Actually we have a half-GEPed policy now for GNOME version numbers. I
| think _almost_ everything in GNOME 2.2 is meant to have a 2.2.x version
| number.
|  But stuff that isn't part of GNOME platform or desktop, such as Galeon,
|  probably shouldn't bother with it. We don't need stuff calling itself
|  version 2.2.0 just because it uses GNOME 2.2 libraries.
Certanly interesting...
- Why Galeon2 is not part of GNOME?

Mozilla dependency comes to mind. Once GRE is ready enough, maybe that
can be reconsidered.

Why is that a problem? Practicly everybody ships mozilla in some for of other, and it is at least as portable as gnome.


Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]