Re: Galeon2 / Nautilus as a web browser [was: Re: KDE Interop [Wa s: D-BUS background]]

[Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>]

Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 16:22, Vadim Plessky wrote:
>
> > On Monday 10 March 2003 17:26, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> > |  Actually we have a half-GEPed policy now for GNOME version numbers. I
> > | think _almost_ everything in GNOME 2.2 is meant to have a 2.2.x version
> > | number.
> > |  But stuff that isn't part of GNOME platform or desktop, such as Galeon,
> > |  probably shouldn't bother with it. We don't need stuff calling itself
> > |  version 2.2.0 just because it uses GNOME 2.2 libraries.
> > Certanly interesting...
> > - Why Galeon2 is not part of GNOME?
>
>
> Mozilla dependency comes to mind. Once GRE is ready enough, maybe that
> can be reconsidered.

Why is that a problem? Practicly everybody ships mozilla in some for of 
other, and it is at least as portable as gnome.

> Rui



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com