Re: RE: Galeon2 / Nautilus as a web browser [was: Re: KDE Interop [Wa s: D-BUS background]]

On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 16:22, Vadim Plessky wrote:
> On Monday 10 March 2003 17:26, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> |  Actually we have a half-GEPed policy now for GNOME version numbers. I
> | think _almost_ everything in GNOME 2.2 is meant to have a 2.2.x version
> | number.
> |  But stuff that isn't part of GNOME platform or desktop, such as Galeon,
> |  probably shouldn't bother with it. We don't need stuff calling itself
> |  version 2.2.0 just because it uses GNOME 2.2 libraries.
> Certanly interesting...
> - Why Galeon2 is not part of GNOME?

Mozilla dependency comes to mind. Once GRE is ready enough, maybe that
can be reconsidered.

> - if it is not Galeon - what browser is part of GNOME?
> I always thought of Galeon as part of GNOME/default GNOME browser.
> Did I miss something?..

It's a thought. Not reality yet, but likely in the future.

+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]