Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?
- From: Mike Martin <redtuxxx yahoo co uk>
- To: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, orbit-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:40:18 +0100 (BST)
--- Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote: > <quote who="James
> > If a machine has orbit2 headers installed, then it also has
> orbit-idl, so
> > any arguments about including the generated files for the benefit
> > people without orbit-idl don't really stand up.
> > If any source tarballs are including generated stubs, then they
> > definitely be fixed. The fix is to not include the generated
> > rather than to include newer versions of generated files.
> Great, thanks for that explanation. Marco was right in saying that
> should be documented a bit better, because it seems that *lots* of
> include the generated files (there is a massive amount of breakage
> in my
> current GARNOME tree). Time to report bugs, then. :-)
just for info - are you getting build breakages or runtime havoc
A build on the weekend left pretty much everything unable to run
before reverting ORBit (libwnck, gnome-panel, nautilus plus all my g2
apps such as evo, epi, gnumeric)
> Thanks James,
> - Jeff
> Get Informed: SCO vs. IBM
> "There are men with an appetite for fight and a sense of
> occasion, and
> then there is Waugh." - SMH, about Steve
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
] [Thread Prev