Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- Cc: GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, orbit-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 23:53:50 +1000
<quote who="James Henstridge">
> If a machine has orbit2 headers installed, then it also has orbit-idl, so
> any arguments about including the generated files for the benefit of
> people without orbit-idl don't really stand up.
>
> If any source tarballs are including generated stubs, then they should
> definitely be fixed. The fix is to not include the generated files,
> rather than to include newer versions of generated files.
Great, thanks for that explanation. Marco was right in saying that this
should be documented a bit better, because it seems that *lots* of tarballs
include the generated files (there is a massive amount of breakage in my
current GARNOME tree). Time to report bugs, then. :-)
Thanks James,
- Jeff
--
Get Informed: SCO vs. IBM http://sco.iwethey.org/
"There are men with an appetite for fight and a sense of occasion, and
then there is Waugh." - SMH, about Steve
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]