Re: Shouldn't we umm start a second volume?

[Robert Mibus <mibus bigpond com>]

On Wed, 2003-05-21 at 01:39, Rich Burridge wrote:
> This is not exactly desktop-devel related but I noticed that the latest
> digest is:
> 
>    desktop-devel-list digest, Vol 1 #1377 - 7 msgs
> 
> Time to start a new volume? Or does some epoch shattering event have
> to occur for this to happen?

I think we're going to get a new volume when:
 * RMS starts using non-free software
OR
 * ddl stops being the ground for new holy wars (galeon vs. epiphany
etc.)
OR
 * The "issue" counter overflows at 2^32

:-D

mibus

-- 
Robert Mibus <mibus bigpond com>