RE: [Setup-tool-hackers] RE: 2.4: System Tools - Please try them
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: sisob eircom net
- Cc: garnacho tuxerver net, aes gnome org, snickell stanford edu, desktop-devel-list gnome org, rodrigo gnome-db org, gpoo ubiobio cl, setup-tool-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: RE: [Setup-tool-hackers] RE: 2.4: System Tools - Please try them
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 07:47:44 +0200
> From: Mark Finlay [mailto:sisob eircom net]
> > I've seen this in MacOS X and I never saw the point
> personally. How is it
> > easier to use them if they are icons on one big window than
> if they are
> > icons in a hierarchical menu?
>
> It is much easier to move your eyes from one part of a catagorised
> control panel than to browse a heirarchical menu with the mouse. Also
> the control panel is more forgiving if you choose the wrong capplet.
> Most users are will have an idea after a few days of using gnome which
> apps are where in the applications menu and what each of them
> does. The
> same is not true of the control center. A person could use gnome for
> months and still not have a very good idea of where
> everything is in the
> control center. This is why menus make sense IMHO for applications but
> not preferences.
I can only say that this was not my experience. I found the old MacOS 7
(GNOME-like) control menus much easier. I find it much easier to find
something alphabetically after I have remembered its name than to find it
somewhere in a big window of stuff. Maybe it's just that the MacOS X control
panels seem arbitrarily divided and categorised. Anyway, this is just one
data point.
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]