Re: comment about gnome architecture

[Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas apestaart org>]

El vie, 12-12-2003 a las 13:06, Jeff Waugh escribió:
> <quote who="Mark McLoughlin">
> 
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 11:50, Marius Andreiana wrote:
> > > An insightful comment at
> > > http://gnomedesktop.org/article.php?sid=1518&mode=&order=0&thold=0
> > 
> > 	I find that insightful comments are usually short, to the point and
> > well informed. This one isn't :/
> 
>  ... and yet this was quite succinct.

Surely there must be a better way to reply to posts that offer valid
comments ? Surely we haven't all grown old and cynical by default when
reading each post ?

For one thing, I can only agree that "the bookmark thing" is something
I'd like to see.  It gets old quite fast trying to move bookmarks from
machine to machine or upgrade to upgrade when for example RH9 had Galeon
and FC1 has epiphany and so on.

Should the barrage of unfocused comments being thrown at us really turn
a blind eye to features users have a right to expect from us given our
long-term goals ?

I remember quite some discussion about the galeon vs. epiphany bookmark
models, but other than that I don't think we got any further to actually
getting the bookmark stuff deeper into GNOME.

Sorry for being unsuccint.

Thomas